Skip to main content

After complaint, Hibbing Courthouse takes down a Ten Commandments plaque

The Freedom from Religion group says the county made the right decision.
  • Author:
  • Updated:

A plaque of the Ten Commandments that had been on the wall for decades was removed from the St. Louis County Courthouse in Hibbing.

It follows a response to a complaint from the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF), which in a "warning" to County Administrator Kevin Gray stated that display of the Ten Commandments on a public building wrongfully links "the justice system with biblical prohibitions rather than secular law."

Gray told FOX 21 that he received a letter from the FFRF asking them to remove the "God's Laws" bronze plaque. 

The county decided to take it down "based on past court decisions," according to the Hibbing Daily News

“As you might presume, the law and norms have developed considerably since the plaque was initially installed decades ago," Gray said, according to FOX 21. 

“It is grotesque to insinuate that the Ten Commandments are associated with a county government’s justice system in any way,” said FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor in her statement. “Saint Louis County did the right thing.”


– Religious freedom group argues Minnesota park's nativity scene needs to go.

About the FFRF

The FFRF is a national non-profit organization based out of Madison, Wisconsin, with two chapters in northern Minnesota: the "Lake Superior Freethinkers" and the "Grand Rapids Atheists and Freethinkers." 

You might recognize the name from last year, when the FFRF argued against a cross being placed in a veteran's memorial garden in Belle Plaine, which later led to The Satanic Temple proposing a monument in response.

The group works to maintain the "separation of church and state," which is paraphrased from founding father Thomas Jefferson and is used as an interpretation of the "establishment clause" of the 1st Amendment.

It has been the subject of much debate as to whether this clause of the First Amendment guarantees this "wall of separation."

Legal challenges in our nation's courts have mostly ruled in favor of the separation, as the Huffington Post describes, though NPR reports on an occasion last year when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a religious daycare denied public funding.

Next Up

Fuzzy Gerdes Flickr Franks Diner Kenosha

WI's best 'hole-in-the-wall' diner is Guy Fieri-approved

Come for the "garbage pile," stay for ... even more breakfast food.


Minnesota's pre-pro women's soccer team unveils name, logo

The new name and look was unveiled after community owners voted on a winner.

fentanyl DEA

21 people charged in connection to drug trafficking in northern MN

Police say the organization sold more than 10 pounds of heroin and fentanyl in northern Minnesota.

Band Box Diner Courtney Mault Flickr

MN's 'best hole-in-the-wall diner' is, sadly, currently closed

MSN recently published its pick for best diner in each state.


Minnesota's COVID-19 update for Thursday, January 27

Cases remain very high but hospitalizations have been plateaued for the past week.

state patrol

Minnesota state trooper injured at crash scene on I-35

The trooper was in his squad when another vehicle struck.

money hundred dollar bills

Charges: Man stole thousands from 3 Twin Cities banks

When he was arrested, police found a folding knife on him.

Kwesi Adofo-Mensah

Here's what Kwesi Adofo-Mensah said in his first press conference

The 40-year-old former Wall Street trader originally wanted to be an economics professor.


Minnesota DFL to allow non-voters to participate in its caucuses

The party is holding its precinct caucuses this Tuesday.

T Kline Robbinsdale City Council

Council member offers first comments on DWI, fleeing police charges

Prosecutors say he was drunk while fleeing police on the wrong side of the highway.

Seventh Street Truck Park shooting, St. Paul

Charges: Man schemed to illegally buy gun used in Truck Park mass shooting

He's the second person to be charged in connection to the straw-purchasing scheme.


Gunmen said frustration with judicial system drove him to open fire in courthouse

The Duluth News Tribune obtained a recording of a phone call that Daniel Schlienz made from jail after two people were wounded in a Grand Marais courthouse following his conviction for criminal sexual misconduct. Schlienz, who died in custody after falling ill, blamed the court system. The county attorney who prosecuted him says Schlienz "stole the story with his violence" and that the real story is that they locked up a dangerous predator.

Prosecutors ramp up security after courthouse shooting

Bulletproof glass, security training and armed guards are among the steps Twin Cities prosecutors are taking to protect themselves after the court shooting in Grand Marais. The Star Tribune reports many courthouses were looking to increase security even before the shooting.

Jail officials: Courthouse shooting suspect is dead

The suspect in a shooting at a Grand Marais courthouse has died, according to Cook County jail officials. Authorities tell KSTP that 42-year-old Daniel Schlienz had been ill and under intense supervision. He allegedly shot two people, including the prosecutor, at a courthouse after he was found guilty of criminal sexual misconduct.

Alleged courthouse gunman asked for medical help day before death

Daniel Schlienz was suffering flu-like symptoms on Monday, and died Tuesday morning in a Duluth hospital. The Duluth News Tribune says there were no signs of foul play or self-inflicted injuries.

Family of courthouse shooter considers wrongful death lawsuit

A St. Louis County Sheriff says Daniel Schlienz, who died Tuesday, waited only three hours for medical care for flu-like symptoms. His family says that information is false. Schlienz was in jail on charges stemming from a Cook County courtroom shooting that left three people injured.

Strict domestic violence no-contact orders in limbo until new ruling from state Appeals

Forum Communications reports some judges in Clay County and elsewhere have ceased issuing "DANCOs," which impose stiffer penalties on violators than ordinary no-contact orders. Prosecutors say they're an important tool to protect abuse victims, but judges are questioning whether they're constitutional. A Beltrami County judge who ruled the order was unconstitutional wrote that "the question is so important and doubtful" that he would like the state appeals court to weigh in on whether he made the right decision.