Skip to main content

Lawsuit aims to block new Minnesota Senate building

  • Author:
  • Updated:

An ex-lawmaker is seeking to block a plan to construct a stately new $90 million Minnesota Senate building next to the Capitol.

Lawmakers earlier this year quietly approved authorization for the new structure as part of a tax bill, but former state Rep. Jim Knoblach objects on the grounds that the construction project was not included in a bonding bill, which is where it normally would be found.

Knoblach filed suit over the matter on Thursday, citing the state's "single subject rule," noted in the state Constitution: "No law shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title."

Generally, state courts have given the Legislature a fair amount of latitude in creating bills that wrapped together a variety of issues. But certain laws have been challenged on the basis of the single source rule, with varying degrees of success, the Star Tribune reports.

Spokesmen for Gov. Mark Dayton and for Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, who led a charge for the project, declined comment before they could fully review the suit, KSTP reported.

Advocates of the project envision a new structure rising from the parking lot north of the Capitol into a building that would better accommodate daily legislative action and alleviate crowding in cramped hearing rooms in the Capitol. It would also have offices for most of the state's 67 senators. Backers hope to see it completed by 2015.

Critics have objected to the size of the project and the way it was slipped into legislation without more attention.

“It shows that in the last hours of session, the Democrats were focused on pay raises for legislators, paybacks for political allies and panoramic views from a new office building,” Minority Leader Rep. Kurt Daudt said, WCCO reported.

Knoblach called the project "a glaring waste of money" – but his suit focuses on how the issue was legislated, not on the building's merits, the Associated Press notes.

Among those who have considered the use of the single subject rule was a young Tim Pawlenty. The future governor penned a piece about the rule in 2000, after the Minnesota Supreme Court considered its use in the case Associated Builders and Contractors, et al. v. Ventura, et al.

Next Up

Screen Shot 2022-08-08 at 7.13.33 AM

Family identifies man killed by police in Otsego

The 21-year-old was reportedly experiencing 'mental health challenges' and allegedly had a knife when deputies opened fire.

88 S 11th St, Minneapolis, Minnesota - April 2022 (1)

Gun found on WCCO-TV rooftop after homicide in Minneapolis

It's the 56th death reported as a homicide in Minneapolis this year.

Screen Shot 2022-08-07 at 11.43.15 AM

Deputies fatally shoot man in Wright County

Police claim the man, who had allegedly been experiencing a mental health crisis, was armed with a knife.

Ambulance hospital emergency

17-year-old killed in northern Minnesota crash Saturday

The other drive involved in the crash, a 75-year-old man, sustained life-threatening injuries.


Alcohol a factor as driver rolls ATV into corn field, injuring 3

The crash occurred in Lake Lillian Saturday night.

Minneapolis police

Man dies after being found shot at Minneapolis' 38th and Chicago

Responders were called to the scene early Sunday morning.

Screen Shot 2022-08-07 at 6.34.12 AM

7 children arrested after 'disturbance' at Cabela's, escape in stolen vehicle

Employees called police saying the children were stealing goods from the store.

Screen Shot 2022-08-06 at 6.16.49 PM

Fire sparks evacuation from apartment building, man arrested for arson

Police and fire crews responded to the fire just before 9 a.m. Saturday.

Flickr - utility pole power line

Morning storms cause power outages, ensuing problems in Eagan

There have been reports of disabled traffic lights and issues at local businesses.

kim crockett facebook sos

GOP nominee questions if those with disabilities, non-English speakers should be able to vote

Crockett made the comments in a 2020 radio interview following a ruling from the Minnesota Supreme Court.


Jury: MN pharmacist did not violate woman's rights by refusing her morning-after pill

Gender Justice, the advocacy group that brought about the lawsuit, says it will appeal the decision.