Minnesota Supreme Court rules in favor of employment protections for unpaid interns, students

The case stemmed from a St. Mary's University doctoral student's experience at a practicum.

The Minnesota Supreme Court decided Wednesday that compensation is not required for an employee to be covered under the state’s civil rights laws.

The Supreme Court sided with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in the case Meagan Abel v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital and St. Mary’s University Minnesota.

The case stems from Abel’s practicum (a practical experience during a course of study) at Allina's Abbott Northwestern Hospital, which was part of her doctoral program at St. Mary’s University.

Minnesota Attorney General represented the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in the case.

According to court documents, Abel began the practicum in September 2015. During her practicum, Abel’s supervisor allegedly engaged in inappropriate behavior, including “highly sexualized group and individual sessions.”

The supervisor would allegedly touch students inappropriately and make sexual remarks. He also allegedly called Abel “the brown one.”

Abel reported the claims to the university and the hospital, but neither acted. She brought civil lawsuits against both Allina and St. Mary’s in March 2018.

Sign up for our BREAKING NEWS newsletters

A lower court dismissed claims for race and sex-based discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The court found Abel’s claims were past the statute of limitations and that a lack of compensation barred her claim.

The Supreme Court reversed those decisions, opening up Abel’s case for further proceedings.

“For the first time in Minnesota history, the highest court in the state ruled Minnesota's civil rights law protects unpaid interns,” said Minnesota Department of Human Rights Commissioner Rebecca Lucero in a statement. “The Court correctly recognized that all Minnesota workers, including interns, are entitled to the protections of the Minnesota Human Rights Act.”

Next Up


State Supreme Court rules that schools must report campaign spending

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled Friday that school districts need to be more accountable in reporting campaign spending. The ruling stems from a 2010 complaint filed against the St. Louis County School District, which alleged district leaders and school board members violated state campaign laws by using public funds to promote the passage of a school building bond referendum -- and not reporting it to the state as campaign spending.

Diocese applauds Supreme Court's 'repressed memory' abuse case ruling

The Diocese of Winona said Thursday it is pleased that the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld a lower court's rejection of a claim by a Savage man that he was abused by member of the clergy in the 1980s. James Keenan lawsuit's against the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis and the Diocese of Winona rested on his repressed memory claims of abuse by a priest who is now defrocked.