Skip to main content

You can steal a car in Minnesota just by sitting in it, court rules

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled a car doesn’t have to move to be stolen.
  • Author:
  • Updated:
    Original:

If you get in someone's car without permission, you can be charged with stealing it – even if it never moves an inch.

That judgement came down from the Minnesota Supreme Court on Wednesday, in the case of Somsalao Thonesavanh.

Thonesavah's case is quite unique. He was arrested in December 2014 after a Worthington man identified in court documents as "J.V." called police to report someone he did not know – Thonesavanh – was banging on the door of his house. 

When an officer arrived at the residence, Thonesavanh was sitting in a vehicle in the driveway. J.V. told police he had been warming up the car before he had to leave for work, and he hadn't given the man permission to get in, the documents say. 

The Worthington Daily Globe says Thonesavanh told officers he was walking somewhere when he got into the car because he was cold, and that was the same reason he was knocking at the door. But in the end, he was still charged with auto theft.

But because Minnesota law says a car thief “takes or drives a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner” – and Thonesavanh didn't take or drive it anywhere – he challenged the charge, and it was dismissed in district court, the documents say.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal in June 2016, effectively ruling that if a car doesn't move, it isn't theft.

But now the state Supreme Court has reversed the two lower courts' rulings.

You don't have to move a car to 'take' it

In Wednesday's Minnesota Supreme Court opinion, Justice David Stras says it all comes down to the word "takes."

The issue is "whether adversely possessing a motor vehicle, even for a brief period, rises to the level of a taking" under Minnesota Statute, Stras writes.

Stras says there are over 80 definitions for "take" in the American Heritage Dictionary. 

But he rejected the lower courts' use of the rule of lenity – which requires ambiguous laws to be decided in favor of the defendant. He argues that if "takes" required movement, then the Minnesota Statute wouldn't say "takes or drives" – which makes it unambiguous.

So while the lower courts had interpreted that "takes" in the motor vehicle theft statute required Thonesavanh to move the vehicle, Stras and the majority of the court found that "taking" a vehicle "requires only adverse possession, not movement."

Next Up

covid nurse doctor hospital wikimedia commons

1st case of monkeypox reported in MN

The Minnesota Department of Health says the risk to the public is "considered low" at this time.

lightning, storm

Isolated severe weather in Minnesota on Tuesday and Wednesday

Definitely not a slam dunk either day, but the chance is there.

ambulance

Driver ejected in fatal crash on Shepard Road in St. Paul

The driver of a Dodge Ram was ejected and died at the scene.

Screen Shot 2022-06-26 at 10.02.59 AM

North Dakota's only abortion clinic relocating to Minnesota

A GoFundMe set up to help the clinic make the move to Minnesota has surpassed its $500,000 goal.

Screen Shot 2022-06-26 at 12.37.03 PM

Deadly vehicle fire on Interstate 94 west of Fargo

The victim's age and name have not been released.

flickr - gov tim walz - mn senate dfl

Overturning Roe v. Wade won't do a 'damn thing' to prevent abortions, Walz says

Gov. Tim Walz signed an executive order Saturday meant to protect abortion access in the state and people who come from out of state seeking one.

ambulance

Man crossing Highway 13 in Burnsville fatally struck by driver

The victim is a 31-year-old man from Prior Lake.

Screen Shot 2022-06-26 at 7.50.33 AM

4 shot near Stone Arch Bridge in Minneapolis

The shooting happened around 11 p.m. Saturday.

Screen Shot 2022-06-25 at 7.55.28 PM

Charges: Cop feared for his life during struggle for gun with suspect

Allen Denzel Oliver-Hall has been charged with second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon.

Related

Minnesota Supreme Court rules on rights for those suspected of DWIs

The court ruled individuals do not have a right to legal counsel before deciding to comply with a blood test if the police have a warrant.

polymet mining

Environmentalists, PolyMet both claim victory after Supreme Court ruling

Both sides are cheering after the Supreme Court issued a ruling related to the proposed mine in northeastern Minnesota.

High court rules Duluth can cut benefits for retired workers

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city of Duluth in a case over retirement benefit cuts. The ruling gives the city the ability to cut retiree health insurance when it's doing the same for current employees.

Small crack in your windshield? Police can't pull you over, court rules

Unless it's obstructing your vision, police need another reason to pull you over.

Driving left turn

Appeals court backs MN driver who turned left into wide right lane

The decision could have implications for driving laws in Minnesota.

Can a court force you to unlock a phone with your fingerprint? Yep

If investigators need your fingerprint to access your phone for a case, they can probably get it.