Ballot measure title fights come to Minnesota high court

Two sides in the fight over how to word the titles of two controversial ballot measures – on gay marriage and photo IDs at polling places – will clash in the Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday.
Author:
Publish date:

The Minnesota Supreme Court will hear more arguments Tuesday over the wording of two highly controversial November ballot measures.

Supporters of the marriage amendment and the photo ID amendment are seeking to stop Secretary of State Mark Ritchie from writing titles that the supporters find misleading and worry might hurt the chances for passage, the Star Tribune reports. Ritchie and Attorney General Lori Swanson argue that state law requires Ritchie to write the titles, and that the wordings he chose accurately describe the two amendments.

Lawyers arguing over titles for the state's two proposed constitutional amendments won't get extra time to make their case at the Supreme Court on Tuesday, the Pioneer Press reports. An order Monday from Chief Justice Lorie Gildea denied a request for additional time from lawyers representing state lawmakers and advocacy groups supportive of the amendments and of the titles selected for them by the Legislature, the newspaper says.

The Uptake is offering a live video stream of the arguments.

Next Up

Related

Minn. Supreme Court rejects challenge to photo ID; throws out ballot issue titles

The Minnesota Supreme Court has rejected a legal challenge to a proposed constitutional amendment that would require voters to show photo ID at the polls. In a separate decision, the court also threw out ballot titles written by Secretary of State Mark Ritchie for the voter ID amendment and another amendment to ban gay marriage. Republicans had argued that Ritchie overstepped his authority and was trying to influence voters to reject both amendments.

Supreme Court won't extend time limits as lawyers argue amendment titles

Minnesota Supreme Court justices will hear arguments Tuesday about the titles of the Constitutional amendments that will appear on the fall ballot. Backers of the marriage and voter ID amendments want the court to get rid of the titles supplied by Secretary of State Mark Ritchie and restore the original titles the Legislature wrote. The court refused to extend the time limits for attorneys to make their arguments.

State Supreme Court to hear marriage, photo ID title arguments on same day

The Minnesota Supreme Court is going to have a busy day July 31. The court Friday scheduled a case that seeks to undo Secretary of State Mark Ritchie's chosen title for the photo ID constitutional amendment the Legislature put on the November ballot. The other, previously scheduled, is for arguments over a nearly identical protest over Ritchie's title for the amendment to ban same sex marriage.

Ritchie's critics urge court to reverse amendment title change

Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie's changes to the title that will appear over the marriage amendment on the fall ballot came under attack in papers filed with the state Supreme Court. Lawyers for Republican lawmakers and other backers of the amendment say Ritchie's changes will make voters less likely to approve the Constitutional amendment. They also argue that it's up to the Legislature - not the Secretary of State - to write the title. A hearing before the court is coming up later this month.

Ritchie also reworks ballot title of voter photo ID amendment

Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie is changing the title of the constitutional amendment to “Changes to in-person & absentee voting & voter registration; provisional ballots." Sponsors of the measure, seeking to require voters to show a photo ID before casting a ballot, want the question titled "Photo Identification Required for Voting." Ritchie is being sued for changing the title on the marriage amendment question.

Justices hear lawyers for administration, Legislature spar over amendment titles

The Dayton administration argues a 1919 law gives the Secretary of State the power to write the titles of Constitutional amendments that appear on the ballot. Lawyers for the Legislature say the Constitution gives lawmakers that authority. Supreme Court justices will need to decide who's right before the end of August, so this fall's ballots can be prepared.

Voter ID ballot question prompts more questions from justices

The Minnesota Supreme Court had plenty of questions for lawyers arguing the merits and shortcomings of the voter ID ballot question. Groups including the League of Women Voters say the question that will appear before voters does not accurately characterize the changes the amendment would make to the Constitution. Lawyers for the Legislature say it's up to lawmakers - not the courts - to write ballot questions.

Supreme Court sets date to hear Voter ID arguments

Critics of the Voter ID question on Minnesota's fall ballot will have their day in court on July 17th. The state Supreme Court will hear arguments then on a petition to have the question removed from the ballot. Four groups argue the question does not accurately describe the amendment.