Debate over insurance coverage of contraceptives now has a Minnesota version

An upcoming federal requirement that health plans cover the full cost of contraceptives will be "grandfathered" in -- meaning it may not apply to existing plans. But a St. Paul DFLer's bill would change that and extend the mandate to all of Minnesota's employer-sponsored health coverage.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

An upcoming federal requirement that health plans cover the full cost of contraceptives will be "grandfathered" in -- meaning it may not apply to existing plans. But a St. Paul DFLer's bill would change that and extend the mandate to all of Minnesota's employer-sponsored health coverage.

Next Up

Related

State extends health care coverage to 16,000 uninsured children

The Minnesota Department of Human Services announced Thursday that the state has begun implementing a 2009 law with a goal of extending MinnesotaCare health care coverage to 16,000 uninsured children. Under the plan, parents whose incomes are below a certain level will no longer have to pay premiums for their children on MinnesotaCare.

Showdown looming over Minnesota health insurance exchange

Gov. Dayton may not be able to create an exchange without legislators on board, and Republicans aren't likely to support a state-run insurance marketplace. The problem is the federal health care overall requires that states show they can run their own exchanges, and if they can't, the federal government will step in to do it for them.

Debate heats up over sprinklers in new homes

The Minnesota State Fire Chief's Association is pushing a new mandate that would require sprinklers in all new homes built in the state. The Minnesota Home Builders Association opposes the mandate, suggesting it could add as much as $15,000 to the cost of new home construction.