Hypocrisy runs deep in both Democrats and Republicans

No surprise to anyone, Democrats like legislation/regulation particularly related to income re-distribution while Republicans chastise all for too much government regulation as they put statutory and, worse, Constitutional constraints on personal matters like Gay marriage, and, eventually, sex acts. But the hypocrisy does not stop there.

By Glenn Dorfman 

No surprise to anyone, Democrats like legislation/regulation particularly related to income re-distribution while Republicans chastise all for too much government regulation as they put statutory and, worse, Constitutional constraints on personal matters like Gay marriage, and, eventually, sex acts. But the hypocrisy does not stop there. There is bi-partisan support, with U.S. Chamber of Commerce backing, for PIPA and SOPA. Not surprisingly, the anti-regulation U.S. Chamber of Commerce is all for this so-called anti-piracy legislation. Why can't the Judiciary be used to sort through this quagmire in a more market-driven manner? I will tell you why. Because in the end, this will not be about piracy; it will be about fences to competition.

This is why we keep hearing so much about the nonsense of "Main Street" businesses versus the "Big Box Stores." Rational consumers support the lowest priced goods or services no matter from whom they are provided, period. Less regulation means less regulation. The movie/music businesses have been gouging consumers for years behind anti-competitive fences. We owe the price drop of recent years to the competition from the Internet. These moguls will have to learn to produce more efficiently and live on a smaller profit. This is what Joseph Schumpeter meant by capitalism's "creative destruction." We must end selective "capitalism"/semi-socialism and embrace the whole deal in order for us to evaluate capitalism's real systemic value. Business/politicians/voters cannot have it both ways.

From Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (New York: Harper, 1975) [orig . pub. 1942], pp. 82-85:

"Capitalism, then, is by nature a form or method of economic change and not only never is, but never can be stationary. And this evolutionary character of the capitalist process is not merely due to the fact that economic life goes on in a social and natural environment which changes and by its change alters the data of economic action; this fact is important and these changes (wars, revolutions and so on) often condition industrial change, but they are not its prime movers. Nor is this evolutionary character due to a quasi-automatic increase in population and capital or to the vagaries of monetary systems, of which exactly the same thing holds true. The fundamental impulse that sets and keeps the capitalist engine in motion comes from the new consumers, goods, the new methods of production or transportation, the new markets, the new forms of industrial organization that capitalist enterprise creates.

From Schumpeter emerges a great irony: If Capitalism is anti-status quo, how can Republican's embrace it since it violates one of their core philosophical principles:

Many contemporary Republicans voice support of strict constructionism, the judicial philosophy that the Constitution should be interpreted narrowly and as close to the original intent as is practicable rather than a more flexible "living Constitution" model.[24]

John Adams, a Founder and conservative Whig, worried that a businessman might have financial interests that conflicted with republican duty; indeed, he was especially suspicious of banks. He decided that history taught that "the Spirit of Commerce ... is incompatible with that purity of Heart, and Greatness of soul which is necessary for a happy Republic." But so much of that spirit of commerce had infected America. In New England, Adams noted, "even the Farmers and Tradesmen are addicted to Commerce." As a result, there was "a great Danger that a Republican Government would be very factious and turbulent there."[28]


Are any of you as tired as I am of being told how to live your private lives by socialist-religious Republicans or Democrats who want people who saved and invested all their lives to "share" resources with spendthrifts or fools. Both sides have full taxpayer provided guaranteed pensions and health care for life. Personally, I have had enough of both. What can you do? Do not give money to any politician this election. Starve them of the mother's milk of politics unless they sign on to doing away with Legislative Pensions and Socialized Health Care that they receive. No more raise taxes on the guy behind the tree but not me, and no more cut spending except what they get! Enough is enough.


One has to enjoy this: Gingrich, the "starve the beast Republican", bragging about how he paid higher taxes than Romney. Of course, it was the Bush tax cuts that enabled capital gains and dividends to be taxed at 15%. Gingrich earns his income as wages and Romney as capital gains and dividends. This is the difference. Gingrich, obviously, doesn't save and invest but rather is a big personal spender. Just what we need in the White House, an unapologetic Keynesian!

Glenn Dorfmann is a curmudgeon of sorts, with the heart of a poet. Email him at gsdorfman@csensesol.com

Next Up


Man dies after being shot outside home near Grove City

He was found outside a home in Acton Township.

Screen Shot 2021-02-27 at 9.39.00 AM

Teen wounded in 'accidental shooting' in Moorhead

The 18-year-old was shot in the abdomen.

Kirill Kaprizov / Minnesota Wild

Watch: Another absurd night for Kaprizov as his legend grows

Kaprizov scored a crazy wrap-around goal in the Wild's victory over the Kings.


DoorDash, Uber Eats bump service fees for Twin Cities customers

After Minneapolis and St. Paul limited what companies can charge restaurants, DoorDash and Uber are charging customers about a dollar more

hockey rink ice arena

Hill-Murray girls' hockey shut down after 3 players with COVID symptoms kept playing

The players showed 'complete disregard' for the school's COVID

Screen Shot 2019-02-12 at 6.18.55 AM

Narrow band of intense snow to bring up to 7 inches to Minnesota

A winter storm watch has been issued where more than 6 inches could pile up.

Icicles; frozen; winter

As Minnesotans brace for huge gas bills, state ups assistance to $1200

Texas wasn't the only state impacted by February's arctic blast.

Kirill Kaprizov / Minnesota Wild

3 first-period goals lead Wild over Kings

With three goals in just over three minutes, the Wild sealed their fifth straight victory.


Today is deadline for Republican, Democratic parties to turn in their redistricting ideas

A special court panel will likely have to decide how to redraw the districts because Dayton and Republican legislators probably won't agree on a plan. Every 10 years the state redraws the boundaries to account for population changes in the Census.

Republicans, Democrats join to oppose plans to fund Vikings stadium through gambling

A group of bipartisan lawmakers say they oppose any plan to expand gambling to raise revenue for a Vikings stadium. Meanwhile, Dayton says tapping Legacy funds might be an "option," and the city of Minneapolis shared some details about its own proposals for a stadium.

With Democrats in control, what's in store for Minnesota?

After a major night for the DFL, Minnesota's Capitol will be under total Democratic control with a DFL governor for the first time in more than two decades. Gov. Dayton will enjoy a far more receptive audience to his demand for income-tax hikes on top earners. Dayton also supports gay marriage under state law.

Democrats, Republicans introduce two new visions for health care exchange

Republicans call what they're offering a free-market alternative to Dayton's plan, while Democrats say their proposal would feature more consumer protections than the governor's own vision. The two parties introduced their ideas during competing news conferences on Monday morning. The Pioneer Press has details ...

Poll shows both Constitutional amendments headed toward approval

A KSTP/Survey USA poll finds the marriage amendment favored by 50 percent of respondents and opposed by 43 percent. The amendment would have the Constitution define marriage as an opposite sex union. In addition, the voter ID amendment was backed by 62 percent and opposed by only half that number. It would require a photo ID to vote, among other election changes.