Minnesota Supreme Court suspends Hennepin County judge without pay

The state's top court says judge Patricia Karasov was not living within her judicial district and failed to cooperate with an investigation into the matter. State law requires district judges to live within the district they serve.
Author:
Publish date:
Updated on

The state's top court says judge Patricia Karasov was not living within her judicial district and failed to cooperate with an investigation into the matter. State law requires district judges to live within the district they serve.

Next Up

Related

Hennepin County to start screening for weapons in suburban courts

Authorities are installing screening equipment similar to that in airports to scan visitors for guns, knives, mace and other such items. The change comes after a district court judge and the county sheriff said they were worried about the lack of security in suburban courtrooms.

Minnesota Supreme Court won't block wolf hunt

Without comment, the Minnesota Supreme Court on Friday rejected an effort by two groups – Center for Biological Diversity and Howling for Wolves – to block the state's wolf hunting season, which begins Nov. 3, the Associated Press reports. The state plans to let hunters and trappers kill 400 wolves out of an estimated population of about 3,000.

New security measures begin at suburban Hennepin County courts

The county board recently voted to install the additional equipment after Judge Lloyd Zimmerman refused to hear cases in the suburbs because of lax security. Zimmerman's concerns were raised several weeks after the shooting in Grand Marais where a prosecutor and witness were critically wounded, the AP reports.

Federal health law has big day in Minnesota court

A panel of judges in St. Paul on Thursday will hear arguments about whether to revive a lawsuit brought by two Missouri residents who object to the law's requirement that they buy health insurance. The argument has drawn support from critics nationwide as well as Republican lawmakers in Minnesota. A lower court dismissed the case, saying the challengers failed to show that the law would harm them directly.