Updated:
Original:

The Jamar Clark case: A look at what no grand jury means and what happens next

Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman announced Wednesday he will not seek a grand jury in the Jamar Clark case – or any future police-involved shootings.

His reason: Grand juries just aren't that transparent and there's lack of accountability, he says.

So how will this affect the process?

What a grand jury does

Let's start with what a grand jury does. Minnesota law says grand juries are required for first-degree murder, and other charges for which the sentence may be life in prison. But they can also be called at the discretion of a county attorney.

A grand jury – which can be from 16 to 23 people – meets in private to hear testimony from witnesses (who are questioned by the prosecutor), as well as review documents, videos and other evidence, Freeman explains.

The grand jury doesn't decide guilt or innocence. Instead, it deliberates in private to decide if there's enough evidence to charge the accused person with a crime.

If there is, the grand jury issues a written statement of the charges called an indictment and the case then goes to trial, the U.S. District Court of Minnesota explains. If there isn't, the grand jury issues a no bill and the case is over.

What are the criticisms?

The main problem critics have with grand juries is they're anonymous, so there's no accountability, Mark Osler, a professor at University of St. Thomas School of Law, told BringMeTheNews Wednesday.

Members of a grand jury are kept secret, and for the most part so are the proceedings. Plus, a grand jury doesn't have to explain afterward why it chose whether or not to indict a person.

Grand juries have especially been criticized in officer-involved shootings, Derik Fettig, former assistant U.S. Attorney in California and externship director at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, explained to BringMeTheNews.

That's because in almost all cases grand juries return an indictment – there's an old saying that a prosecutor could persuade a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich," Fettig says.

But that's not the case with officer-involved shootings – he calls them "an anomaly."

CityPages reports there is no record of an officer in Minnesota being charged with murder in connection to an incident that happened while they were on the job. (For a detailed look at officer-involved shootings and how many people are indicted, check out this Washington Post investigation.)

This leads to speculation from those on the outside, Fettig says. Critics say because the prosecutor is the only person presenting evidence to the grand jury, it could give them "too much control over the process."

An example Fettig gave: A prosecutor may want to protect their relationship with police, so they could present evidence that would make the grand jury not return an indictment.

Fettig acknowledged a grand jury can be beneficial. It allows members of the community to look at evidence, gives an opportunity for witnesses to testify to help determine the facts of the case. And it doesn't leave the decision up to one person, such as a county attorney.

Freeman's decision is 'significant'

It's common practice these days for a county attorney to convene a grand jury to decide charges in officer-involved shootings. So when Freeman announced he wasn't going to, it was a pretty "significant" move, Osler says.

Instead of the anonymity behind a grand jury, we'll now know the "who" making the decision on whether or not someone is charged, Osler expalins. This "certainly heightens" the scrutiny, accountability and pressure put on the county attorney, according to Fettig.

Fettig called Freeman's decision a big change, but noted it doesn't "totally alleviate" concerns that prosecutors have too much control. There's no law that dictates how county attorneys must work when deciding charges (it's typically a less formal process than what's involved in a grand jury), and there won't necessarily be a ton of transparency during that process.

But there could be more "after-the-fact" disclosure, Fettig says. The public and the media can ask questions – something that isn't there when a grand jury is used.

Fettig's guess is that under this new procedure, if there is a high-profile case (possibly this one) or a handful where charges aren't brought against the officers involved, then there could be new calls for reform. There would also be a "perceived bias" between the county attorney and the police department.

Activists and Jamar Clark's family were happy with Freeman's decision, saying it's a step in the right direction, but real justice will come when officers are held accountable and face charges, KSTP reports. Freeman's decision on possible charges for the Minneapolis police officers who fatally shot Clark last November is coming at a later, unspecified date.

Will other county attorneys follow suit?

Fettig said it would be interesting to see if other county attorneys decide to follow Hennepin County's lead, noting the public perception regarding officers not being held accountable for shootings probably won't change unless more start being charged.

Anoka County Attorney Tony Palumbo has convened a grand jury to review the case of Michael Kirvelay – he was fatally shot by police in Columbia Heights last fall.

Kirvelay's family has asked for no grand jury, and on Wednesday they released a statement calling on Palumbo to follow Hennepin County's lead.

Palumbo told MPR News Anoka County isn't changing its policy on grand juries for officer-involved shootings, but noted "county attorneys are always looking at their process to make sure they're correct."

The publication mentioned others who disagreed with Freeman's decision, saying the community should be the ones passing judgement in officer-involved shooting cases, not the county attorney.

Last August, California became the first state to ban grand juries in officer-involved shooting cases, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Next Up

moose minnesota usfws - flickr

MN homeowner mistakes large tent for dead moose

They spotted two people on a security camera dragging the "moose" across a driveway.

Flickr - minneapolis police officer close-up belt camera - Tony Webster

What happens if Mpls. public safety question passes? City memo provides answers

The memo was sent to the mayor and council members Tuesday morning.

Wild

COVID-19 hits Minnesota Wild coaching staff

The Wild will be shorthanded for Tuesday night's game in Vancouver.

Anthony Edwards

Ant takes alpha role after bad loss: 'We need to lock the f*** in'

The Timberwolves' rising star was not happy after Monday's loss to the Pelicans.

parker eisinger

Lakeville football player diagnosed with cancer week before playoffs

The tenth-grader was diagnosed with a form of cancer most commonly found in people aged 65 and older.

University of Minnesota peeping tom suspect

Someone keeps trying to film showering women at U of M

The university has received three reports in the past two weeks.

john Fluevog shoes 1

John Fluevog Shoes closes its Uptown Minneapolis store

The brand could return to the Twin Cities one day.

sidecar drink

Sidecar — Town Hall's new cocktail lounge — is officially open in Minneapolis

It's the fifth Town Hall location, but the first to focus on cocktails.

Screen Shot 2019-07-18 at 9.10.30 AM

Here's where DFLers stand on Minneapolis' public safety ballot question

The question would create a Department of Public Safety and remove some requirements.

Arthur Kollie

Man pleads guilty to brutal murder of 14-year-old girl in Fargo

The 14-year-old girl was the victim of a random attack outside a Fargo strip mall.

Minneapolis Mayoral Candidates 2021 - jacob frey sheila nezhad kate knuth

Here's who has endorsed the frontrunners for Minneapolis mayor

Politicians and community groups are voicing their opinions.

Related

The Jamar Clark case: A look at what no grand jury means and what happens next

His reason: Grand juries just aren't that transparent and there's lack of accountability.

Vigil planned to mark one year since Jamar Clark was killed by police

Tuesday marks the one-year anniversary of Jamar Clark's death at the hands of Minneapolis police.

Jamar Clark shooting: No discipline for the officers involved

The police chief also acknowledged the "devastating loss that left the Clark family without a son and brother."