Top court rejects claim that urine sample is unreliable proof in drunken driving case - Bring Me The News

Top court rejects claim that urine sample is unreliable proof in drunken driving case

The state Supreme Court rejected a man's claim that "first-void" urine samples are inaccurate because they contain urine that has "pooled" in the driver's bladder over time and therefore don't reflect the actual blood-alcohol content level.
Author:
Updated:
Original:

The state Supreme Court rejected a man's claim that "first-void" urine samples are inaccurate because they contain urine that has "pooled" in the driver's bladder over time and therefore don't reflect the actual blood-alcohol content level.

Next Up

Related

Alleged clergy abuse victim speaks out after after Supreme Court rejects case

Alleged clergy abuse victim James Keenan is speaking out after the Minnesota Supreme Court rejected his lawsuit against Diocese of Winona and the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis over a statute of limitations. Keenan claimed he was molested by a pastor in Apple Valley in the 1980s, but repressed his memory of it until six years ago when he filed the suit.

MN Supreme Court rejects repressed memory argument in abuse case

A man from Savage says he was abused by a priest during the 1980's. He filed his lawsuit after the statute of limitations was up, but argued the court should hear the case because he had only recently recovered the repressed memories. The court rejected the argument, writing that the theory of repressed memory is unproven.

Cell phone tower alongside BWCA is a go after Supreme Court rejects case

The Minnesota Supreme Court refused to hear a case involving construction of a 450-foot cell phone tower just outside the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Critics of the plan argued the blinking tower would mar the scenery of the federal wilderness area. But an appeals court sided with AT&T, which will now move ahead with the tower.

State's top court to decide validity of repressed memories in sex abuse case

A man claims he was abused by a priest decades ago, but he's filing the lawsuit outside the statute of limitations. His attorney argues that he had repressed the memories of the abuse, so he wouldn't have been able to bring the case at the time. The state's supreme court is trying to determine whether repressed memories are scientifically valid. If so, the case could open up the church to more sex abuse claims.

Christopher & Banks rejects buyout

Aria Partners last Tuesday offered to buy Christopher & Banks for $1.75 per share, 51 percent more than the Plymouth-based company's stock closing price. The company rejected the deal Friday, suggesting that the "proposal does not reflect the full, long-term value stockholders are expected to receive from continued focus on the current strategy."