Trump travel ban one of 2 high-profile cases the Supreme Court will review

A limited version of the travel ban will go into force ahead of the SCOTUS reconvening in October.

All eyes will be on the U.S. Supreme Court later this year as it has agreed to take a look at two high-profile cases – one of them President Donald Trump's proposed travel ban.

The court will review the case against Trump's executive order temporarily blocking entry to the U.S. from several Muslim-majority nations, before deciding to hear the case when the court convenes in October.

The announcement from SCOTUS is here, with ABC News reporting it would require five of the nine justices to agree to overturn injunctions granted by lower courts that have prevented the ban from going into effect.

However, in announcing the review, the SCOTUS said it is temporarily lifting the injunctions anyway, allowing a limited version of the ban to go into effect. The president has previously said it would be implemented 72 hours after the say-so from the courts.

This will mean foreign nationals from the six Muslim nations can be blocked from entering the U.S. unless they have "a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."

With one of those countries Somalia, it will have implications for the Somali community in Minnesota.

The Washington Post notes that one of the things the SCOTUS will consider is if the travel ban debate is "moot" by the time October comes around, given that it only calls for 90-day bans on travelers from Libya, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the U.S.

The ban is temporary so the government can review its vetting procedures as it steps up security against terror threats.

Minnesota is one of several states that joined a lawsuit to block Trump's two travel ban executive orders, winning injunctions in district courts that were upheld by appeals courts.

Religious liberty case will also be heard

Another major case that will be heard by the Supreme Court relates to religious liberty, namely whether business owners can deny service to same-sex couples.

The case of Masterpiece vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission relates to a Colorado cake artist who refused to make a cake for a same-sex couple's wedding reception, claiming it would violate his religious liberty under the Constitution.

The LA Times notes no federal law requires businesses to serve all customers, but 21 states – including Minnesota – have "public accommodations" laws that prevent such discrimination based on sexual orientation.

The finding of the SCOTUS could have wide-ranging impacts on those states that have such discrimination laws.

Together, the religious liberty and travel ban cases mark a high-profile start to the SCOTUS' October session, with intense focus expected on the court that is once again filled with nine justices following the appointment of Neil Gorsuch earlier this year.

Next Up

Lakeville South

May bomb threat at south metro school traced to Lakeville area kid

Months of investigation led to the digital footprint of the juvenile.

WIkimedia Commons - Frey April 20, 2021

Frey backs creation of Dept. of Public Safety, removal of police staffing minimums

He is in favor of removing police staffing minimums from the city charter – which this November's ballot question would also do.

Foreman tl - Flug-Presley tr - Sturm bl - Pettus br - Go Fund Me and Facebook

St. Paul PD takes over quadruple killing probe after it emerged they died in Minnesota

A "thorough investigation" reveled where the four Minnesotans were killed.

superior national forest

Highway 1 reopens as Greenwood Fire is 80% contained

The highway has been closed for about a month.

covid, vaccine

Minnesota's COVID-19 update for Monday, September 20

Data in Monday reports includes the past Friday, not the weekend. Weekend data is released on Tuesdays.


Driver killed in ATV rollover crash north of Alexandria

The crash occurred in Douglas County Sunday evening.


Appeals court refuses to reinstate President Trump's travel ban

President Trump had asked the appeals court to lift the restraining order blocking his new immigration rules.

Update: President Trump's new travel ban is also blocked by courts

A federal court put President Trump's revised travel ban on hold, just as courts did with the original one.

Trump administration to release revised travel ban executive order next week

The original executive order has been temporarily blocked by the courts.

Minnesota joins states suing federal government over new travel ban order

Minnesota is one of six states opposing the order through the courts.

The U.S. Supreme Court is letting Trump's travel ban go into effect – for now

The Supreme Court is letting the president's order go into effect – for now.

Trump’s travel ban isn't being reinstated – how MN lawmakers are responding

"I hope it is soon struck down for good," Sen. Al Franken said.

President Trump's new travel order restricts travel from 8 countries

Critics are calling it a new version of Trump's "Muslim ban."