You can steal a car in Minnesota just by sitting in it, court rules

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled a car doesn’t have to move to be stolen.

If you get in someone's car without permission, you can be charged with stealing it – even if it never moves an inch.

That judgement came down from the Minnesota Supreme Court on Wednesday, in the case of Somsalao Thonesavanh.

Thonesavah's case is quite unique. He was arrested in December 2014 after a Worthington man identified in court documents as "J.V." called police to report someone he did not know – Thonesavanh – was banging on the door of his house. 

When an officer arrived at the residence, Thonesavanh was sitting in a vehicle in the driveway. J.V. told police he had been warming up the car before he had to leave for work, and he hadn't given the man permission to get in, the documents say. 

The Worthington Daily Globe says Thonesavanh told officers he was walking somewhere when he got into the car because he was cold, and that was the same reason he was knocking at the door. But in the end, he was still charged with auto theft.

But because Minnesota law says a car thief “takes or drives a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner” – and Thonesavanh didn't take or drive it anywhere – he challenged the charge, and it was dismissed in district court, the documents say.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal in June 2016, effectively ruling that if a car doesn't move, it isn't theft.

But now the state Supreme Court has reversed the two lower courts' rulings.

You don't have to move a car to 'take' it

In Wednesday's Minnesota Supreme Court opinion, Justice David Stras says it all comes down to the word "takes."

The issue is "whether adversely possessing a motor vehicle, even for a brief period, rises to the level of a taking" under Minnesota Statute, Stras writes.

Stras says there are over 80 definitions for "take" in the American Heritage Dictionary. 

But he rejected the lower courts' use of the rule of lenity – which requires ambiguous laws to be decided in favor of the defendant. He argues that if "takes" required movement, then the Minnesota Statute wouldn't say "takes or drives" – which makes it unambiguous.

So while the lower courts had interpreted that "takes" in the motor vehicle theft statute required Thonesavanh to move the vehicle, Stras and the majority of the court found that "taking" a vehicle "requires only adverse possession, not movement."

Next Up

Chauvin trial

Walz declares emergency in Twin Cities, bringing in police from Ohio and Nebraska

The governor has asked the Legislature for emergency funding for the additional police.

derek chauvin court - closing arguments

Closing arguments in Derek Chauvin trial: Here's what was said

The jury listened to lengthy presentations from the prosecution and defense.


Man, 55, airlifted to a hospital after hit-and-run in Granite Falls

The passenger in the vehicle told police about the incident.

Minneapolis, unrest

Facebook labels Minneapolis 'high-risk,' will remove posts that incite violence

Facebook will remove posts that call for weapons to be brought to Minneapolis and anything that celebrates George Floyd's death.


After being sued, MyPillow is now suing Dominion

The company's lawsuit claims the voting system suppressed free speech and hurt its business relationships.

Chet Holmgren

Chet Holmgren makes his decision ... and it's Gonzaga

The Minnesota basketball phenom is following the footsteps of Jalen Suggs.

Sarah Glover

MPR News hires NBC's Sarah Glover as new managing editor

The experienced journalist was the first to serve two terms as president of the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ).

football play

Watch: Sixth-grader with cerebral palsy makes touchdown in Detroit Lakes

Kale Hannahs' classmates made sure he got a chance to play during recess.

coronavirus, covid-19

Here is Minnesota's COVID-19 update for Monday, April 19

The latest from Minnesota health officials.

Trey Sermon

5 running backs the Vikings could select in the NFL Draft

Who could the Vikings add to their backfield?

Brooklyn Center, protest, Daunte Wright

Letter details CNN journalist's arrest experience during Daunte Wright protests

Media outlets sent a letter to officials following a phone conference about the mistreatment of the press over the weekend.


Minnesota Supreme Court rules on rights for those suspected of DWIs

The court ruled individuals do not have a right to legal counsel before deciding to comply with a blood test if the police have a warrant.

High court rules Duluth can cut benefits for retired workers

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city of Duluth in a case over retirement benefit cuts. The ruling gives the city the ability to cut retiree health insurance when it's doing the same for current employees.

Small crack in your windshield? Police can't pull you over, court rules

Unless it's obstructing your vision, police need another reason to pull you over.

Driving left turn

Appeals court backs MN driver who turned left into wide right lane

The decision could have implications for driving laws in Minnesota.

In 1971, what was the Minnesota Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage?

On Oct. 15, 1971, the Minnesota Supreme Court made an historic stand on the same-sex marriage issue. What was its ruling? For the answer, click on the headline above...

State campaign finance director doubts U.S. court ruling will affect MN

Monday's U.S. Supreme Court ruling struck down Montana's ban on corporate money in politics. Minnesota's campaign finance director says changes the Legislature made after 2010's landmark court case mean this week's ruling should have little impact here.

Can a court force you to unlock a phone with your fingerprint? Yep

If investigators need your fingerprint to access your phone for a case, they can probably get it.